The Employment Situation of Immigrants and Natives in the First Quarter of 2018

CIS analysis of new Bureau of Labor Statistics data

By Steven A. Camarota on May 22, 2018

Download a PDF of this Backgrounder.


Steven A. Camarota is the director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies.


While the unemployment rate has improved significantly in recent years, the official unemployment rate includes only those who have looked for a job in the last four weeks. It does not include those of working-age who have dropped out of the labor force entirely — neither working nor looking for work. (Figures do not include those in prison.) The labor force participation rate has not returned to pre-2007 recession levels and, relative to 2000, the rate looks even worse. Things are particularly bad for those without a college education. The problem is not confined to one area of the country; in virtually every state, labor force participation is lower in 2018 than in 2007 or 2000 among the less-educated.

Among Native-Born Americans:

  • The overall unemployment rate for natives in the first quarter of 2018 was 4.4 percent, much lower than at the peak of the Great Recession. However, the overall unemployment rate obscures the low labor force participation rate, especially among those without a college education.
  • There has been a long-term decline in the labor force participation rate of working-age (18 to 65) natives without a bachelor's degree. Only 70 percent of natives in this group were in the labor force in the first quarter of 2018; in 2007, before the recession, it was 73.8 percent, and in the first quarter of 2000 it was 76.1 percent.
  • The labor force participation rate of natives without a college degree has shown no meaningful improvement in recent years. For example, in the first quarter of 2012 it was actually slightly better than it was in the first quarter of 2018.
  • The decline in labor force participation among those without a bachelor's degree is even more profound when it is measured relative to those who are more educated.
  • In the first quarter of 2018, 70 percent of natives without a bachelor's degree were in the labor force, compared to 85.8 percent of those with a bachelor's degree — a 15.8 percentage-point difference. In the first quarter of 2007, the gap was 12.4 percentage points, and in the first quarter of 2000 the gap was 11.7 percentage points.
  • In 48 states plus the District of Columbia, labor force participation of natives without a college degree was lower in the first quarter of 2018 than the same quarter in 2007. The same is true comparing 2000 to 2018.

Among Immigrants:

  • Working-age immigrants without a college education also have not fared well since the recession. Unlike the labor force participation of natives, immigrants without a college education did improve their situation between 2000 and 2007. But it has not returned to 2007 levels. Also like natives, there has been no meaningful progress in the last few years.
  • In the first quarter of 2018, the labor force participation rate of immigrants (18 to 65) without a bachelor's degree was 71.9 percent, somewhat better than that of natives, but still below their rate of 73.4 percent in the first quarter of 2007.

Immigrants and Natives Not in the Labor Force:

  • In the first quarter of 2018, there were a total of 50.1 million immigrants and natives ages 18 to 65 not in the labor force, up from 43.3 million in 2007 and 37.2 million in 2000.
  • Of the 50.1 million currently not in the labor force, 39.9 million (80 percent) do not have a bachelor's degree.
  • The above figures do not include the unemployed, who are considered to be part of the labor force because, although they are not working, they are looking for work. There were almost seven million unemployed immigrants and natives in the first quarter of this year; more than three-fourths of the unemployed do not have a bachelor's degree.

Data and Methods

The two primary employment surveys collected by the U. S. government are referred to as the "household survey" (also called the Current Population Survey or CPS) and the "establishment survey" (also called the Current Employment Statistics Survey or CES). The establishment survey asks employers about the number of workers they have. In contrast, the CPS asks people at their place of residence if they are working. Both surveys are collected by the Census Bureau for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). While the two surveys show the same general trends, the figures from the two surveys differ to some extent.

Because it asks workers about their employment situation, only the CPS provides information about who is working, who is looking for work, and who is neither working nor looking for work. Moreover, only the CPS asks respondents about socio-demographic characteristics such as education, age, and country of birth. Thus, only the CPS can be used to compare employment among immigrants and the native-born. (The establishment survey is not released to the public, so no independent analysis of it is possible.) For these reasons, this analysis uses the public-use files of the CPS to examine employment in the United States by quarter. For each quarter, the three CPS surveys combined include roughly 350,000 natives and 43,000 immigrants. Like all government surveys, the data is weighted to reflect the actual size and demographic makeup of the U.S. population.

The data for the tables in this report comes from the public-use files of the January, February, and March CPSs for 2000 to 2018. Quarterly data is more statistically robust, especially for smaller populations like immigrants and minorities, due to the inclusion of three months of data. Persons in institutions like prisons or nursing homes are not included in the CPS. The CPS is the nation's primary source for unemployment and other labor force statistics.

The government publishes employment statistics that are both seasonally adjusted and unadjusted from the survey. The figures in this analysis are seasonally unadjusted. Unadjusted figures are computationally simpler and easier for other researchers to replicate. In general, the BLS does not provide separate estimates for the foreign-born (immigrants) and the U.S.-born broken down by characteristics like education, race, and age. However, all CPS respondents are asked these questions. The Census Bureau defines the foreign-born as persons who were not U.S. citizens at birth, which includes naturalized citizens, legal immigrants who are not citizens (green card holders), temporary visitors and workers, and illegal immigrants. All figures for the total U.S. population in this report match seasonally unadjusted figures from the BLS.

Defining Labor Force Attachment

The Unemployed. The standard measure of unemployment, referred to as U-3, takes the number of people who report that they are not working and have looked for a job in the last four weeks and divides it by the number actually working plus those looking for work. The top halves of Tables 1, 3, and 5 report the number employed and the number unemployed for the first quarter of each year, 2000 to 2018. The left sides of Tables 7, 8, and 9 also report the U-3 unemployment rate in detail for different segments of the population in 2000, 2007, and 2018. We focus on 2007 and 2000 because they represent the peak years of the last two economic expansions.

The Labor Force. The labor force includes all those working or who have looked for work in the four weeks prior to the CPS. The bottom left of Tables 1, 3, and 5 show the number and share of those not in the labor force. When looking at the number and share not in the labor force, it is very common to report statistics only for those under age 65 because the overwhelming majority of those over 65 do not work for reasons not related to economic conditions. The right sides of Tables 7, 8, and 9 report the number working in detail for different segments of the population in the first quarters of 2000, 2007, and 2018. The tables also report the share of people in the labor force, which is the inverse of those not in the labor force, as shown in Tables 1, 3, and 5. The right sides of Tables 7, 8, and 9 also report the employment rate. The employment rate is simply the share of people in each segment of the population who are working. Tables 10 through 13 report labor force participation statistics at the state level for 2000, 2007 and 2018.

Graph: Labor Force Participation for Immigrants and Natives without a Bachelors Degree, 2000 to 2018
Table: Employment Stats, Q1, 2000 to 2018
Table: Employment Stats, Q1, 2000 to 2018
Table: Employment Stats, Q1, 2000 to 2018
Table: Employment Stats, Q1, 2000 to 2018
Table: Employment Stats, Q1, 2000 to 2018
Table: Employment and Unemployment for Natives and Immigrants, Q1, 2018
Table: Employment and Unemployment for Natives and Immigrants, Q1, 2018
Table: Employment and Unemployment for Natives and Immigrants, Q1, 2007
Table: Employment and Unemployment for Natives and Immigrants, Q1, 2007
Table: Employment and Unemployment for Natives and Immigrants, Q1, 2000
Table: Employment and Unemployment for Natives and Immigrants, Q1, 2000
Graph: Employment Rate for all Natives, 2000 to 2018
Graph: Employment Rate for Black Natives, 2000 to 2018
Graph: Employment Rate for Hispanic Natives, 2000 to 2018
Graph: Employment Rate for White Natives, 2000 to 2018
Graph: Labor Force Participation Rate for all Natives, 2000 to 2018
Graph: Labor Force Participation Rate for Black Natives, 2000 to 2018
Graph: Labor Force Participation Rate for Hispanic Natives, 2000 to 2018
Graph: Labor Force Participation Rate for White Natives, 2000 to 2018
Table: Labor Force Participation (LF) Ages 18 to 65 in 2000, 2007, 2018
Table: Labor Force Participation (LF) Ages 18 to 65 in 2000, 2007, 2018 (excluding students)
Table: Labor Force Participation (LF) Ages 18 to 65 in 2000, 2007, 2018 (no bachelor's)
Table: Labor Force Participation (LF) Ages 18 to 65 in 2000, 2007, 2018 (no bachelors, excluding students)