This week, we had a bit of political theater courtesy of Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the House immigration subcommittee, in the form of a hearing titled “Oh, Canada! How Outdated U.S. Immigration Policies Push Top Talent to Other Countries”.
Let’s look at some of the overall differences between the U.S. and Canada in regard to immigration:
Difference No. 1: The Bases of Immigration. A major difference is that the U.S. immigration system is mostly family-based, while the Canadian system is mostly employment-based.
Difference No. 2: Foreign Workers in Canada Are Not Chained to Their Employers. On the employment-based immigration side, Canada’s system is different as well. What the U.S. has is really an employer-based system. The employer makes the visa petition on behalf of the potential immigrant.
In Canada, the potential immigrants make their own visa applications. Having a job is a factor in getting accepted, but the potential immigrants determine their own fates.
Furthermore, even temporary workers can change jobs easily. In fact, it is illegal in Canada to fire a temporary worker for looking for another job.
Difference No. 3: Priority. The U.S. system is largely first-come, first-served and queues applicants. The Canadian system scores potential immigrants. Those with higher scores get priority. Those who do not make the score threshold are rejected.
Difference No. 4: Quotas. The U.S. limits immigration by numerical quotas. The Canadian system limits immigration by score.
Difference No. 5: Labor Protections. Canada requires a Labour Market Impact Assessment for nearly all foreign labor.
The employer must advertise the job for four weeks and show no Canadians are available. The job must pay at least the average wage for the occupation and location.
The H-1B program in the United States does not require any labor market showing. It is explicitly legal to replace Americans with H-1B workers, and the employer determines the “prevailing wage”, which is nearly always less than the actual average wage.
* * *
The reality is that America is never going to adopt a Canadian-style immigration system.
Replacing family-based immigration with employment-based immigration is not going to happen. Want to see an immigration lobbyist have a conniption fit? Suggest that America have an employment-based immigration system where the immigrant drives the process, as in Canada. U.S. employers are not going to give up their ability to replace American workers with cheap, foreign workers that they have fought for decades to achieve in favor of a Canadian-style system.
In looking at Canada with no real intention of adopting their system, Rep. Lofgren has, once again, demonstrated the fundamental paradox of immigration reform: The only people who can fix the system are the very same people who broke it in the first place.