Immigration Blog

How "Once and for All" Got a Bad Name in the Immigration Debate

By Jerry Kammer, February 24, 2015

I welcome the opportunity to work with anyone who wants to build on the improvements we've put in place, and fix our broken immigration system once and for all.

— President Barack Obama in The Hill, February 24.

President Obama's desire to reform immigration policy "once and for all" has a familiar ring to it. It has reverberated throughout the national debate since Congress invoked it when it passed the ill-named Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. Read more...

Huffington Post Pretends Uncomfortable Truths Are "Myths"

By CIS, February 20, 2015

Most economists see immigration policy as a matter of trade-offs. No matter which policy we choose, there will always be winners and losers, and our political values help us decide how to weigh those competing interests. For some advocates of mass immigration, however, there seems to be no recognition of trade-offs at all. They have developed talking points that falsely portray immigration as a win-win for everyone involved. Read more...

NPR Story: Iranian Mother Sees Her Daughter's Future in "The Paradise of the World"

By Jerry Kammer, February 20, 2015

Steve Inskeep, the host of NPR's "Morning Edition" program, has been reporting from Iran for his program and for others on NPR. Yesterday's "Here and Now" program included a brief clip of Inskeep's conversation with an Iranian mother about her hopes for her daughter: Read more...

Washington Legislature Hypocritically Tackles Aliens and Crime with a Sanctuary Bill

By Dan Cadman, February 20, 2015

A sanctuary bill has been introduced into the Washington state legislature. Its sponsors call it the "Washington Family Unit Act", but in fact, what the law does is shield alien criminals from identification and apprehension by federal immigration authorities. Read more...

Immigration: Up vs. Down, Not Republican vs. Democrat

By Mark Krikorian, February 19, 2015

CIS Legal Policy Analyst Jon Feere appeared on C-SPAN's Washington Journal this morning opposite Crystal Williams of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, and what struck me was the callers.

C-SPAN offers three call-in numbers, for Republicans, Democrats, and Independents, and I'd guess on issues like taxes or guns or abortion that yields a variety of views. But whatever you might think from watching the Senate battle over funding of Obama's lawless amnesty decrees — where every Democrat has been voting for amnesty and against enforcement — out in the real world support for enforcing our immigration laws is not a partisan issue. So whatever phone line people use to call in to C-SPAN, my experience from being on the show has been that most callers are pro-enforcement.

On today's show every caller was pro-enforcement (except one who was off-topic and another who was unintelligible). Some samples: Read more...

"Something Is Rotten in the State of Denmark"

By Dan Cadman, February 18, 2015

With this famous line in Shakespeare's Hamlet, Marcellus speaks to an ill befalling the Danish state. That line came to mind with the recent, tragic terrorist attacks in Copenhagen directed toward a free-speech conference and then a synagogue hosting a bat mitzvah by a hate-spewing Islamist who is purported to have sworn allegiance to ISIS on the Internet. Read more...

Budgetary Rules Stacked Against Proponents of Low Immigration

By CIS, February 18, 2015

When the federal government issues an "unfunded mandate", it imposes costly regulations without providing the money that states or private-sector entities need to comply. Unfunded mandates reflect an irresponsible "pass the buck" mentality and — perhaps not surprisingly — immigration law offers many examples. One of the most prominent is the Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. Doe, which effectively mandated free public schooling for illegal alien children. Read more...

Have a Nice Day, Be on Your Way, and Can You Please Throw your Beer/Joint Away?

By Dan Cadman, February 18, 2015

Thanks to Judicial Watch, light has been shone on another stupid administration policy where immigration enforcement is concerned.

First the background: Folks who know anything about enforcing immigration laws at the border know that within 100 miles of the physical international boundary, Border Patrol agents can conduct roving patrols or even establish temporary checkpoints to determine the citizenship (or right to be in the United States) of drivers on our highways and byways. Read more...

Executive Action Non-Enforcement of the Law Takes a Legal Hit

By Dan Cadman, February 17, 2015

On February 16, a federal judge in Texas enjoined the administration from "enforcing" the myriad executive actions that were announced with much fanfare and a national televised address by the president last November. (The 3-page injunction is here, while his 123-page ruling is here.)

This is no small irony since, in essence, the executive actions involved directed the various immigration agencies of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to not to enforce the law and, instead, to provide a panoply of benefits to upward of five million aliens living and working unlawfully in the United States. Read more...

American Samoa's Government: "Don't Let Our People Be U.S. Citizens"

By David North, February 16, 2015

Though there are strong indications that many alien residents of the Mainland, (legal and illegal) want to become U.S. citizens, there is a small, native-born, legally present population who should be denied that citizenship, according to their own elected leaders.

You read that right. The politicians, in this narrow case, do not want their fellows to become American citizens!

The deniers include the democratically elected territorial government of American Samoa and the brand new congressional delegate from that place, Amata Radewagen. Read more...